Image

main image
UploaderAnonymous,
Tagsanthro, armored_fighting_vehicle, cannon, comrade, furry, gun, machine_gun, marxism_leninism, meta:transparent_background, nofap, peaked_cap, porn, red_star, soviet_union, star, t-34, tank, tankie, weapon
Source
LockedNo
ParentNone
RatingSafe

Comments

Anonymous 2018-05-23 19:22:07 No.159 [Reply]

No fap:
When porky offers you something for free, no strings attached, you just uncritically accept it? No suspicion, no alarm bells in your head?

The deficiencies are obvious if you masturbate too much, just look at the nutritional composition of semen.

erictile dysfunction: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/879982

porn is not natural for our brains: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSF82AwSDiU

too much and too little also lowers testosterone: https://www.testofuel.com/tf/does-masturbating-lower-testosterone/

Masturbation is also not the same as sex: Consistent with expectations, results revealed that testosterone levels increased 36% among men during a visit to the sex club, with the magnitude of testosterone change significantly greater among participants (72%) compared with observers (11%).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21165688
Giving up porn and masturbating less falls under self-improvement given they are addictive habits. /pol/s misunderstanding of soy is a completely different issue.
https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/cambridge-university-brain-scans-find-evidence-consistent-addiction
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1874574

Science requires curiosity, it's not a dogmatic refusal of any piece of information contradicting your biases because said contradiction of your bias implies a bias in the source, it's not stating that you believe whatever you want and that you can distrust any source what. That's simply an argumentation tactic, not an honest standard you apply to all notions you yourself hold as true.

Click to load HCaptcha